A Warning to the Independently Minded

You, the individual, and your neighbours around you do not have to take care of the hungry, the needy, diseased, disabled or homeless in your community because we, your elected government’s officials will plan and administer the programmes needed for those purposes from our central offices. These programmes, designed by intellectuals, directed by bureaucrats and funded by you, the willing tax payer, will resolve all these difficulties in your area. The programmes are already in progress. As we continue taking over the welfare functions that you and your neighbours used to perform by yourselves through your churches, civic organisations and neighbourhood groups, here are some cautions for you keep in mind. Continue reading

My Second Blog!!

My next door neighbour is a lady called Helen and she is a solicitor. She lives with a Somali Muslim who teaches mathematics. He drinks and smokes and enjoys the company of the three playful dogs in our enclave. I get on pretty well with him but am more comfortable with Helen, a white English woman from the midlands.

The other day I surprised her by saying I could see no answer to the Palestinian problem since a two state solution was simply pie in the sky.

Surely, she said, compromise through negotiation and good will has to be practiced until the ‘peace process’ finally succeeded. I dare say her attitude is almost universal among westerners because to her a permanent state of hostilities was unthinkable.

And there of course lies the problem that our political leaders are unable to tackle. They, like<!–more–> her, believe with the right amount of goodwill and honest compromise, peace in Palestine will at last come about.

What they are unable to comprehend is that they are dealing with people culturally completely unlike themselves, westerners who regard negotiation as a process leading to a conclusion of benefit to both participants.

But the Muslim sees all conflict in stark black and white. He sees only victory or defeat, honour or shame, there is no middle ground. So when Israel swaps land for peace as they did in Gaza, the West expects the Gazans to regard the deal as conclusive and the beginning of a new chapter of mutual benefit for Jew and Arab.

Recent history has shown otherwise. Gaza was merely another step on the prescribed road to supremacy of Muslim over Jew (and every other unbeliever). The final goal of course being the destruction of the state of Israel and the extermination of the Jewish race throughout the world.

In an interview with Israel Hayom, Ayaan Hirshi Ali spells it out. She says: <em>’From the perspective of the Arab leaders, reaching a two-state solution is to betray God. If you want peace and not merely a process, you must make peace with the people. The negotiators themselves are of no importance.'</em>* Because to the Arabs, reaching a 2-state solution is to betray God, the Koran, the hadith and Islam.

So it is the Arab people themselves, not just their leaders, who have to be convinced that the right way is the West’s way, the Judaeo-Christian way, and that their way is simply wrong.

Which will never happen in this century, will it?

* Ayaan Hirshi Ali at the Presidential Conference in Jerusalem, 28 June 2013:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/06/ayaan-hirsi-ali-on-2-state-delusion-reaching-a-2-state-solution-is-to-betray-god-the-koran-the-hadit.html
.

Indonesian Criminals

<img src=”http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/AG-AD311_Ziv_G_20121205112448.jpg&#8221; /> Adi Zulkadry and Anwar Congo making up for their key roles
 
 <strong><u>I watched a film on Friday evening</u>.</strong>
 
 
 
 In late 1965, the Indonesian army orchestrated the killing of  communists and suspected sympathisers in reprisal for what they claimed was an attempted Communist coup. It proved to be one of the great mass killings of the 20th century. It was the beginning of the passing of power from Sukarno to Suharto.
 
 
 
 Director Joshua Oppenheimer’s (exec producer Werner Hertzog) film, ‘The Act of Killing’ has focused on the perpetrators of this slaughter and it has become what I believe to be a unique examination of the lives of killers as they grow old among both supporters and survivors.
 
 
 
 In making the film, numerous original members of the ‘gangsters’ as they proudly call  themselves, were made up and directed to act out<!–more–> their killing sprees. They also proudly displayed their trophies and looted art works in their palatial homes, rather as Goering would proudly display his Vermeers and van Dykes to his Nazi friends. But the similarity ends there; Goering had taste, these modern day Nazis collected Tretchikov trash, glass dolphins, badly stuffed tigers and an Antelope head, hugely prized because of its critically endangered status.
 
 <img src=”http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/343/330/343330995_640.jpg&#8221; />
 
The survivors too were pressed into the action and as one of the tormentors boastfully demonstrated how he would use thin wire and a piece of wood to murder his victims the cinema audience seemed paralysed, uncertain that we weren’t actually watching the real thing, a snuff movie, so horrifying it was. Two hours watching laughing, joking mass-murderers, revisiting their blood-drenched past in a manner at once insanely surreal and distressingly domestic, was something of an ordeal too fascinating to look away from (though two viewers did run from the cinema).
 
 <img src=”http://cdn.realscreen.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/The-Act-of-Killing1.jpg&#8221; />
 
Towards the end the Boss Man, a grinning thug, Anwar Congo, is interviewed on Indonesian TV by a possibly sexually excited presenter who claps her hands and cries ‘Good’ as Congo describes and justifies his behaviour in front of the cameras and an applauding studio audience.
 
 <img src=”http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/407/572/407572060_640.jpg&#8221; />
 
But some of the killers, now forced to become reenactors rather than perpetrators became somewhat uneasy; “We shouldn’t look brutal,” says the leader of the Pancasila youth, after watching a baying mob whipping themselves into an axe-wielding frenzy. “We shouldn’t look like we want to drink people’s blood – that’s dangerous… for the image of the organisation.”
 
 <img src=”http://aarhus.guide.dk/files/Nyheder/film/2012/act-of-killing.jpg&#8221; />
 
There have been no official screenings in the country where it took place, though it has been shown in about 265 underground screenings, with secret invitations among small groups, but there is the fear that police might try to block the screenings. Still, by the end of February this year, some 10,000 have been to see it.
 
 A national police spokesman did not respond to questions asking whether the police would have tried to stop showings of the film.
 
 These people are free and presumably protected by the Indonesian government.  They are regarded as heroes by the local population. One of the killers is asked if he did not worry that he might have to face the ICC in the Hague, after all the film is gold to any criminal prosecutor. ‘Of course not’ he said, ‘I would be happy to fly to Brussels, (sic) they would understand why I did it, it HAD to be done.’ But then, perhaps he was aware that Indonesia, like North Korea, Pakistan or Saudi, were not and had no intention of being, signatories to the Rome Statute.

<img src=”https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/p480x480/1069820_570037913049221_144218870_n.jpg&#8221; />

Still, an application for the extradition of these murderers would certainly put the Indonesians on the spot.
 
 
 
 Slobodan Milosevic, Ratko Mladić, Goran Hadžić, they have all been brought to trial. Why not Anwar Congo and the other death squad leaders, many of them anonymous in the credits but quite a few named and unambiguously condemning themselves from their own mouths?
 
 .

But they aren’t like us, Helen.

<img src=”http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6iYGZkGyvjg/TgY3PRQMvWI/AAAAAAAAABY/waJ0SF7myWM/s1600/hajj+pilgrimage+%25286%2529.jpg&#8221; />
 
 My next door neighbour is a charming lady called Helen and she is a solicitor. She lives with a Somali Muslim who teaches mathematics. He drinks and smokes and enjoys the company of the three playful dogs in our enclave. I get on pretty well with him but am more comfortable with Helen, a white English woman from the midlands.
 
 The other day I surprised her by saying I could see no answer to the Palestinian problem since a two state solution was simply pie in the sky.
 
 Surely, she said, compromise through negotiation and good will has to be practiced until the ‘peace process’ finally succeeded. I dare say her attitude is almost universal among westerners because to her a permanent state of hostilities was unthinkable.
 
 And there of course lies the problem that our political leaders are unable to tackle. They, like<!–more–> her, believe with the right amount of goodwill and honest compromise, peace in Palestine will at last come about.
 
 What they are unable to comprehend is that they are dealing with people culturally completely unlike themselves, westerners who regard negotiation as a process leading to a conclusion of benefit to both participants.
 
 But the Muslim sees all conflict in stark black and white. He sees only victory or defeat, honour or shame, there is no middle ground. So when Israel swaps land for peace as they did in Gaza, the West expects the Gazans to regard the deal as conclusive and the beginning of a new chapter of mutual benefit for Jew and Arab.
 
 Recent history has shown otherwise. Gaza was merely another step on the prescribed road to supremacy of Muslim over Jew (and every other unbeliever). The final goal of course being the destruction of the state of Israel and the extermination of the Jewish race throughout the world.
 
 In an interview with Israel Hayom, Ayaan Hirshi Ali spells it out. She says: <em>’From the perspective of the Arab leaders, reaching a two-state solution is to betray God. If you want peace and not merely a process, you must make peace with the people. The negotiators themselves are of no importance.'</em>* Because to the Arabs, reaching a 2-state solution is to betray God, the Koran, the hadith and Islam.
 
 So it is the Arab people themselves, not just their leaders, who have to be convinced that the right way is the West’s way, the Judaeo-Christian way, and that their way is simply wrong.
 
 Which will never happen in this century, will it?

* Ayaan Hirshi Ali at the Presidential Conference in Jerusalem, 28 June 2013:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/06/ayaan-hirsi-ali-on-2-state-delusion-reaching-a-2-state-solution-is-to-betray-god-the-koran-the-hadit.html
.

A little known incident

 <img src=”http://img.narodna.pravda.com.ua/images/doc/6/8/684a3-operation0frantic0map.gif&#8221; /> <b>Apologies for the poor quality</b>
 
 
 Poltava is a city in central Ukraine, about the size of Stockport but with perhaps a little more charm (Or Stockton, California, for Americans).
 
 During the Great Patriotic War the Nazis occupied it from October 1941 until it was retaken by the Red Army in September 1943. Little happened there that didn’t happen to countless cities towns and villages and no great battles were fought for it (though a equally little-known battle of enormous importance was to be fought at Cherkassy 150 miles to the west in early  ’44).

More than 8,000 Jews were murdered in the district.
 
 On the 2 June 1944 the first mission of Operation Frantic was flown by the United States 8th Army Air Force. This was a series of shuttle bombing attacks whereby B17s  flying either from Britain or Italy could use the Soviet air base at Poltava in order to extend their range and to overfly areas previously outside the limits of their targets.
 
 The operation lasted for four months and had two aims. One was to be ‘a veritable model of air warfare in order to impress the Russians with admiration and confidence.’ and the other was to ‘distract the Germans on the eve of the Normandy landings.’*
 
 The first Frantic, flown from Foggia, Italy, dropped a thousand bombs on the marshalling yards at Debrecen, Hungary’s second city and continued on to Poltava where, due to bad weather the US bombers waited a week before returning to Italy attacking the airport at Foscani in Rumania on the way.
 
 The Germans had left Poltava in ruins when they retreated the previous September. All of the necessary facilities, including hangars and control towers, had to be built. Most of the permanent party and all of the shuttle crews would be housed in tents.
 
 One runway was 3,300 feet, the other 1,900 feet. B-17s needed runways at least a mile long. There was no time to construct hard-top runways so mats of pierced-steel planking were laid down instead. The Americans provided the planking and the Soviets contributed the labour, much of which was performed, to the amazement of the Americans, by women.
 
 Everything, including high-octane gasoline, vehicles, most rations, and 12,393 tons of pierced-steel planking, had to be shipped in, either by air through Tehran or by ship from Liverpool to Murmansk and south from there by rail.** The Soviets supplied meat and fresh vegetables. In a stipulation that would prove to be critical, the Russians would not allow US fighters to perform air base defence. <img src=”http://i45.tinypic.com/2lcobxs.gif&#8221; />The airfield would be defended by Soviet anti-aircraft batteries and Yak-9 fighters.
 
 The second Frantic mission took place, this time with the task force, which consisted of 114 B-17s, and 70 P-51 Mustangs, flying from Lincoln, across Germany, bombing the synthetic oil plant at Ruhland, south of Berlin, and continuing to Poltava. Beyond Warsaw,<img src=”http://www.doyle.com.au/Awen/awen3_files/ME_109.JPG&#8221; /> a lone Me-109 German fighter kept pace with them and ducked into clouds when the P-51s went after it. It had reported the position of the bombers to the Luftwaffe. <img src=”http://www.portalestoria.net/IMAGES%20270/he177%5B1%5D.jpg&#8221; />An He-177 reconnaissance aircraft followed the B-17s into Poltava and took pictures. The Russians would not allow the US fighters at Piryatin, a Soviet airbase 50 miles closer to the front, to intercept it.
 
 But on arrival at Poltava, the whole Frantic project came to grief when the Luftwaffe attacked the airport and destroyed 43 B17s and damaged 26: they also destroyed fifteen of the Mustang escorts, assorted Russian aircraft and ignited 450,000 gallons of aviation fuel. Most of the munitions in the bomb dump were also destroyed. One American and 26 Russians were killed in the attack. The Russians would not clear US fighters to take off and attack the Germans. There were no German casualties.
 
 <img src=”http://torlin.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/poltava03.jpg&#8221; /><b>caught on the ground; the Germans were good at this but the Russians never learned.</b>
 
 The shuttle’s return was delayed until June 26 and all flights were abandoned for the whole of July until their petrol dump had been replenished by fuel trucked through Persia and the Caucasus.** The same day, the 26th, permission was requested for a<img src=”http://www.ww2warbirds.net/ww2pics/ww2northrp61-1.jpg&#8221; /> P-61 Black Widow night fighter squadron to deploy to Ukraine to defend the bases. The proposal was strung out and sidetracked until the Americans finally dropped it.
 
 Stalin also refused to co-operate over supply drops from Poltava to the beleaguered Polish insurgents in Warsaw during the uprising, forcing British and Polish volunteers to fly return trips from Foggia at the cost of 200 pilots’ lives.
 
 ** The sound track of a US film of Operation Frantic made during the autumn of 1944 states that among the supplies taken to Poltava were fuel oil, 3,000 miles via Persia, radio equipment and operators via Egypt and Palestine, food and other supplies essential for the mission, 2,000 miles from Liverpool to Murmansk, then a further 2,000 miles from Murmansk to Poltava.
 
 
 Sources:
 
 <em>‘The Poltava Affair,’</em> Glen B Infield
 
*<em>‘The Army Air Forces in World War II’</em>, Craven and Cate (editors) volume 3.
 
 <em>‘Auschwitz and the Allies’</em>, Martin Gilbert
 <em>
 ‘United States’ Strategic Bombing Surveys,’</em> Air University Press

Feeding the mouths that bite us.

Well, well, well. It seems the accused Boston bombers managed to swallow their disdain for all things American long enough to enjoy years of taxpayer-funded welfare benefits.

The media in Boston report that brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and their relatives collected more than $100,000 in benefits since their arrival in this country. The assistance ranged from “cash and food stamps to Section 8 housing,” the Boston Herald revealed.

And get this. The same newspaper reported that the Administration of Governor Deval Patrick tried to keep this information from becoming public, allegedly because of the need to protect “privacy concerns” of the accused jihadists. Sure thing, Governor.

I wonder what the UK tax payer is stung for, subsidising our own Islamic radicals?

I doubt we’ll ever really know, what with “privacy concerns” and human rights issues.

 

After all, it’s only our money.